HE Research Snippet 8 – Why Clearing students are twice as likely to be ‘detractors’ of your university

Posted on 24th July 2013 by Youth

Research Snippets: Our monthly Research Snippets look at interesting and topical findings unearthed by the HE team at YouthSight. See all our HE Research Snippets here. If any of your colleagues would like to receive our Research Snippets, ask them to drop a line to: james.macgregor@YouthSight.com

Most students who go through Clearing have had to re-evaluate their university choices because their grades were not what they hoped for. Having not got into their first choice institution (and with a higher chance of choosing an ill-fitting or compromise institution or course instead), it is perhaps unsurprising that Clearing students are more likely than other students to be dissatisfied with their early university experience. Indeed, Snippet Two from last year, which looked at improving retention amongst first year students, partly focused on higher levels of dissatisfaction amongst Clearing students. In the run up to Clearing for the 2013/14 academic year, we wanted to investigate this issue in further detail; this month’s Snippet compares the likelihood of Clearing students and non-Clearing students to recommend their current institution to others. It also looks at why Clearing students in particular might not want to do so. Finally, this month’s HE Snippet looks at some measures that universities can take to improve the situation.

Are Clearing students really less satisfied?

Our Higher Expectations study asks new first year students how likely they would be, on a scale of zero to ten, to recommend their current institution to someone considering university. By subtracting ‘detractors’ of the institution (those who scored 0-6) from ‘promoters’ (those who scored 9-10), the results are used to produce a ‘Net Promoter Score’ (NPS) – for further details on the NPS, please see March’s Research Snippet. As you might expect, the NPS for Clearing students is significantly lower than the NPS for non-Clearing students (as shown in Figure 1 below).

Figure 1: Net Promoter Scores – Clearing vs. Non-Clearing students
Net Promoter Scores – Clearing vs. Non-Clearing students

NP1. How likely is it that you would recommend your university to someone considering university?
Base: All Higher Expectations students 2012/13: All students (12,444); Clearing students (1,025); Non-Clearing students (11,309)

Why are Clearing ‘detractors’ not likely to recommend their current institution? And can universities do anything to improve things?

We also asked new first year students not likely to recommend their current institution (i.e. ‘detractors’) why they would be unlikely to do so. The open-ended responses have been coded and the five most common reasons are shown in Figure 2 below. Clearing ‘detractors’ are most likely to not recommend their current institution because of its location, its reputation and a limited social life; each of these reasons are significantly higher than the proportion amongst non-Clearing ‘detractors’. Clearly, it may be extremely difficult for institutions to address concerns like reputation and location in the short term.

Figure 2: Clearing students’ top five reasons for not recommending their current institution

Clearing students’ top five reasons for not recommending their current institution

NP2b. Why would you not be very likely to recommend your university to someone considering university?
Base: All students not likely to recommend their institution (detractors): Clearing students (221); Non-Clearing students (1,025)

However, when comparing some of the open-ended responses for why Clearing students were either a ‘promoter’ or a ‘detractor’, it’s clear that some universities were far more effective than others at bringing their Clearing students on-side, simply by reaching out through a more inclusive culture and providing higher levels of support.

Clearing 'detractors' and 'promoters'

Conclusions

Given the importance of student retention to universities, it is crucial that institutions consider their Clearing students and cater for the fact that they may be less positively pre-disposed to the university experience. Overall, they are far more likely to be dissatisfied, certainly during the first few months of university, and many universities will not be able to counter the concerns that many students have with fundamental aspects of the institution (for example, dissatisfaction with the location). However, there are things that can be done to make the early university experience as enjoyable as possible; it is therefore important for universities to recognise the levels of support that Clearing students may require in order to ensure high levels of student satisfaction, and implement strategies accordingly.

Our Higher Expectations survey offers more detailed analysis of student satisfaction levels and full open-ended verbatim responses (at the level of the detailed institution) for reasons behind satisfaction/dissatisfaction, choosing/declining institutions as well as many other factors. Contact us on 020 7288 8789 or john@youthsight.com for more information.

John Newton, (Senior Project Manager, Higher Education)
john@youthsight.com
020 7288 8789

YouthSight owns the consumer access panel for higher education: 70,000 current students, 18,000 graduates and 17,000 applicants and 10,000 other young people.We’ve completed hundreds of projects for our HE clients, helping over 90 universities and HE organisations obtain the insights and data they need to drive important decisions. We’ve helped policy bodies collect evidence for ground breaking reports, we’ve helped marketing directors develop winning strategies and we’ve helped Deans to create new early stage course propositions that genuinely meet market needs.Our portfolio of products is based on a clear understanding of the needs of HE professionals combined with a sophisticated approach to the ‘tools of our trade’, including qualitative and quantitative interviews, regression & key driver analysis, Price Sensitivity Meter and choice-based conjoint or trade-off techniques. Here are some of our key products and approaches:

 

More HE research snippets
HE research solutionsy
Clients and case studies

Related Posts

HE Research Snippet 25 – Video Insights Into The New PG Loan...

28th March 2017

We think the new PG loan is big news.  It was introduced in 2016 with the aim of boosting the stagnating PGT enrollment numbers[1], especia...

HE Research Snippet 24 – Could tackling the gender pay gap help unive...

1st September 2016

Gender pay inequality is big news. Last week’s IFS’s report on the topic dominated the headlines. In her inaugural speech as Prime Minis...

HE Research Snippet 23 – For PGT, The Importance Of Reputation Is Onl...

23rd June 2016

When choosing a university for a postgraduate degree, reputation becomes more important for many prospective postgraduates. YouthSight’s s...

HE Research Snippet 22 – Links with industry and placement opportunti...

26th May 2016

The sector has crossed a symbolic line. For the first time our Higher Expectations survey has recorded that, when selecting where to study, ...

HE Research Snippet 21 – When it comes to university choices, parents are...

19th April 2016

Our HE Research Snippets reveal interesting findings from YouthSight’s HE team. Please contact James MacGregor, Director of Higher Educati...

HE Research Snippet 20 – Just How Important Is Community Membership For F...

18th November 2015

Our HE Research Snippets reveal interesting findings from YouthSight’s HE team. Please contact James MacGregor, Director of Higher Educati...

HE Research Snippet 19 – Clearing students need your love...

25th August 2015

Research Snippets: Our monthly Research Snippets look at interesting and topical findings unearthed by the HE team at YouthSight. See all o...

HE Research Snippet 18 – Don’t ignore the subtleties of applicant d...

7th May 2015

Research Snippets: Our monthly Research Snippets look at interesting and topical findings unearthed by the HE team at YouthSight. See all o...